Felder

(PC) Dedmon v. Felder

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20242:23-cv-00234California293 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DE’ANDRE L. DEDMON, SR., No. 2:23-cv-0234 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER, FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 MICHAEL FELDER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed January 8, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 18 to file an amended complaint was granted. On February 15, 2024, plaintiff was granted an 19 additional twenty days in which to file an amended complaint. Thirty days from that date have 20 now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the 21 court’s order. 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this action to 23 a United States District Judge. 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 25 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.