(SS) Walton v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20241:24-cv-00238California1,730 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACKLYN NICOLE WALTON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00238-CDB (SS)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

v. DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ISSUE

SUMMONS, SCHEDULING ORDER, AND

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR

SECURITY, REASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS

15 Defendant. (Docs. 2, 6) 16 17 Jacklyn Nicole Walton (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in this action on February 22, 2024, seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability benefits. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (or “IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). Plaintiff’s application did not contain sufficient information for the Court to determine whether Plaintiff is entitled to proceed IFP, and on February 27, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a long-form IFP application. (Doc. 3). On March 19, 2024,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.