(SS) Walton v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20241:24-cv-00238California1,730 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JACKLYN NICOLE WALTON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00238-CDB (SS)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

13 v. DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ISSUE

SUMMONS, SCHEDULING ORDER, AND

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR

SECURITY, REASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS

15 Defendant. (Docs. 2, 6) 16 17 18 Jacklyn Nicole Walton (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in this action on February 22, 2024, 19 seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability 20 benefits. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead filed an application to proceed 21 in forma pauperis (or “IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). Plaintiff’s application did 22 not contain sufficient information for the Court to determine whether Plaintiff is entitled to 23 proceed IFP, and on February 27, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a long-form IFP 24 application. (Doc. 3). On March 19, 2024,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.