Miranda

(PC) Fregia v. Miranda

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20241:21-cv-01068California3,284 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK FREGIA, Case No. 1:21-cv-01068-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

GRANTING DEFENDANT RIDGE’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MIRANDA, et al., (ECF No. 81) Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff Mark Fregia (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Ridge and Savage based on Plaintiff’s claims that Defendants were deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs by continuing to prescribe medications that caused him to suffer lichen planus, and then failed to treat such skin condition. Currently before the Court is Defendant Ridge’s motion for summary judgment1 on the grounds that Plaintiff cannot produce evidence that Defendant Ridge (“Defendant”) was deliberately indifferent to any serious medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.