Ervin
(PS) Peters v. Ervin
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CAITLIN NICOLE PETERS, No. 2:23-cv-00684-DAD-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
13 v. 14 CHARLES ERVIN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against several defendants alleging 18 constitutional violations related to state criminal proceedings and state civil child custody 19 proceedings; plaintiff also requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See ECF Nos. 1, 2.) 20 The court granted plaintiff’s IFP request and dismissed the complaint; however, plaintiff was 21 granted 28 days to amend the complaint and was warned that failure to do so by the required 22 deadline could result in sanctions, including “dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).” (ECF No. 3 at 5.) 24 On November 13, 2023, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint alleging numerous 25 constitutional violations. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff also requested electronic filing access.…