Hart

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER ELLIOTT, No. 2:22-cv-1496 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 R. HART, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On March 19, 2024, defendants filed a 18 motion for administrative relief for extension of time to file a motion for summary judgment by 19 sixty days, citing Local Rule 233. (ECF No. 31.) 20 Local Rule 233 21 It does not appear defendants’ request for extension is properly brought as a motion for 22 administrative relief under Local Rule 233: 23 Miscellaneous administrative matters which require a Court order may be brought to the Court’s attention through a motion for 24 administrative relief. Examples of matters that such motions may address include motions to exceed applicable page limitations; 25 requests to shorten time on a motion; requests to extend a response deadline; requests to alter a briefing schedule; or requests to alter a 26 …