Hart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER ELLIOTT, No. 2:22-cv-1496 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. HART, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On March 19, 2024, defendants filed a motion for administrative relief for extension of time to file a motion for summary judgment by sixty days, citing Local Rule 233. (ECF No. 31.) Local Rule 233 It does not appear defendants’ request for extension is properly brought as a motion for administrative relief under Local Rule 233: Miscellaneous administrative matters which require a Court order may be brought to the Court’s attention through a motion for administrative relief. Examples of matters that such motions may address include motions to exceed applicable page limitations; requests to shorten time on a motion; requests to extend a response deadline; requests to alter a briefing schedule; or requests to alter a …