(SS) Gibbs v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20241:21-cv-00503California5,590 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SERENA ELIZABETH GIBBS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00503-KES-HBK 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

13 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANT

DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND AFFIRM

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER

15 SECURITY,1 OF SOCIAL SECURITY 2 16 Defendant. (Doc. Nos. 24, 29) 17 FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 18 19 Serena Elizabeth Gibbs (“Plaintiff”), seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 20 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for 21 supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is 22 currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. 23 (Doc. Nos. 24, 29). For the reasons stated, the undersigned RECOMMENDS denying Plaintiff’s 24 motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.