Mai
(PS) Dozier v. Mai
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEE DOZIER, 1:23-cv-00759-DAD-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 v. 14 CHI MAI, ET AL. 15 Defendants. 16
17 18 On May 16, 2023, plaintiff filed this action asserting violations of the Americans with 19 Disabilities Act (ADA) and Unruh Civil Rights Act. (ECF No. 1.) These claims stem from 20 alleged barriers plaintiff encountered while he visited a facility owned, operated, or leased by 21 defendant Chi Mai (“defendant”). (See generally, id.) 22 On November 22, 2023, after defendant failed to respond to the complaint, the clerk’s 23 office entered default. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff moved for default judgment against defendant on 24 January 16, 2024, and set a hearing for February 21, 2024. (ECF No. 18.) Defendant did not file 25 any opposition to the motion, and the undersigned took plaintiff’s motion under submission and 26 vacated the motion hearing date.1 (ECF No. 22.) 27 1 On February 20, 2024, defendant, proceeding without counsel, filed a document…