J.P.

J.P. v. City of Stockton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20242:21-cv-00788California598 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ESTATE OF SAOUN POL and J.P., No. 2:21-cv-00788 WBS AC 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 CITY OF STOCKTON, STOCKTON

POLICE DEPARTMENT, ERIC JONES,

14 JORGE ANDRADE, BRADLEY MILLER and DOE 1 to 10, 15 Defendants. 16 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Amended Stipulated Protective Order (ECF 18 No. 70), is APPROVED and INCORPORATED herein. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: 20 1. Requests to seal documents shall be made by motion before the same judge who will 21 decide the matter related to that request to seal. 22 2. The designation of documents (including transcripts of testimony) as confidential 23 pursuant to this order does not automatically entitle the parties to file such a document with the 24 court under seal. Parties are advised that any request to seal documents in this district is governed 25 by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 141. In brief, Local Rule 141 provides that documents may only 26 be sealed by a written order of the court after a specific…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.