(HC)Prado

(HC)Prado v. Cueva

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20241:23-cv-01521California520 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEJANDRO PRADO, No. 1:23-cv-01521-KES-EPG (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

13 v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

14 DANIEL E. CUEVA, TO CLOSE CASE, AND DECLINING TO

ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

15 Respondent. (ECF No. 6) 16 17 Alejandro Prado (“Petitioner”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ 18 of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 30, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations 21 recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to state a 22 cognizable claim. (ECF No. 6.) The findings and recommendations were served on Petitioner and 23 contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.