(PC) Fierro v. Department of the Treasury

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20241:24-cv-00002California1,113 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUIS ANGEL FIERRO, No. 1:24-cv-00002-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, et FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION al., RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION 15 FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 1) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff 19 filed the instant action on January 2, 2024. 20 On January 3, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay the $405.00 filing fee or submit an 21 application to proceed in forma pauperis within forty-five days. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff failed to 22 comply with the Court’s order. Therefore, on February 27, 2024, the Court issued an order to 23 show cause why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff has failed to file a 24 response to the order to show cause and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.