Carter

(PC) Israel v. Carter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20242:21-cv-01267California892 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AKIVA AVIKAIDA ISRAEL, No. 2:21-cv-01267-DAD-KJN (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

14 RUBY CARTER, et al., (Doc. No. 112) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Akiva Avikaida Israel is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 18 in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a 19 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 6, 2024, the undersigned issued an order adopting the assigned magistrate 21 judge’s findings and recommendations and denying plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, 22 granting defendant Ruby Carter’s motion for summary judgment, and dismissing this action. 23 (Doc. No. 109.) That same day, judgment was entered. (Doc. No. 110.) On March 18, 2024, 24 plaintiff filed the pending motion, styled as a motion to amend the judgment, which the court 25 construes as a motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.