Lopez
(PC) Crane v. Lopez
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD J. CRANE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00922-KES-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL
13 v. NOTICE 14 G. LOPEZ, DEBBIE ASUNCION, (Doc. No. 63)
DANIEL SANCHEZ, M. CONTRERAS,
15 and JOSEPH C. DOLIHITE, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DISMISS CASE1
16 Defendants. (Doc. No. 52, 64) 17
FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
18 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 4, 20 “SAC”). In response to the Court’s November 20, 2023 Screening Order, Plaintiff filed 21 Objections and a Motion for Judicial Notice, in support of his Objections. (Doc. Nos. 63, 64). 22 For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned grants in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Judicial 23 Notice but nonetheless recommends the district court dismiss the SAC because it fails to state any 24 cognizable federal claim. 25 //// 26 /////B 27 1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28…