Tarrant

(PC) Martinez v. Tarrant

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20242:23-cv-01218California2,053 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRED FELEKI MARTINEZ, No. 2:23-cv-01218 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 TARRANT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state inmate, proceeds without counsel and seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s complaint filed on June 23, 2023, is before the court for screening. (ECF 20 No. 1.) The complaint states an Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against each of the four 21 named defendants. Within 30 days, plaintiff must inform the court whether he will proceed with 22 these claims or file an amended complaint. 23 I. In Forma Pauperis 24 Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff’s declaration makes 25 the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The motion is granted. 26 Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 27 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By separate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.