Mike Murphy's Enterprises, Inc. v. Fineline Industries, LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9 MIKE MURPHY'S ENTERPRISES, INC., Case No. 1:16-cv-00784-JLT-SAB
10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE
11 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) 12 FINELINE INDUSTRIES, LLC, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
13 Defendant. (ECF No. 79) 14 15
FINELINE INDUSTRIES, LLC,
16 Counter Claimant, 17 v. 18 MIKE MURPHY'S ENTERPRISES, INC., 19 Counter Defendant. 20 21 On March 21, 2024, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with 22 each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. (ECF No. 79.) In light of the stipulation of 23 the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San 24 Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an 25 award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 26 / / / 27 / / / / / / 1 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 2 | case and adjust the docket to reflect…