Parks

(PC) Howard v. Parks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20241:24-cv-00285California2,021 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KARLIS RUBEN AUGUSTUS No. 1:24-cv-00285-SAB (PC)

HOWARD,

12 SCREENING ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT v. 14 (ECF No. 1) AYLANA OLIVIA PARKS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed March 7, 2024. 21 I. 22 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 23 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 24 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 25 Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 26 “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that 27 “seek[] monetary relief against a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.