(PC)Hooker

(PC)Hooker v. Clendenin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20241:23-cv-00969California3,085 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 CAMERON HOOKER, No. 1:23-cv-00969-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

AND

STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., 13 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

(ECF No. 8)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

18 Plaintiff Cameron Hooker appears to be a pre-adjudication civil detainee proceeding pro 19 se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff 20 challenges the California regulation that prohibits internet usage for certain detained individuals 21 on the ground that it violates his First Amendment rights. (ECF No. 8 at 3, 7). The Court 22 previously screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it failed to state any cognizable claims, and gave Plaintiff leave to amend. (ECF No. 7). Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC) on September 5, 2023 (ECF No. 8), which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.