(PC)Hooker
(PC)Hooker v. Clendenin
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9 CAMERON HOOKER, No. 1:23-cv-00969-EPG (PC) 10 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN
DISTRICT JUDGE
v. 12
AND
STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., 13 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO 14
DISMISS THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
15 FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
16 (ECF No. 8)
17 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY
DAYS
18 Plaintiff Cameron Hooker appears to be a pre-adjudication civil detainee proceeding pro 19 se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff 20 challenges the California regulation that prohibits internet usage for certain detained individuals 21 on the ground that it violates his First Amendment rights. (ECF No. 8 at 3, 7). The Court 22 previously screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it failed to state any cognizable claims, 23 and gave Plaintiff leave to amend. (ECF No. 7). Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC) 24 on September 5, 2023 (ECF No. 8), which…