Vasquez

(PC) Cortinas v. Vasquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20241:19-cv-00367California838 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00367-JLT-SKO (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR 45-DAY STAY

13 v. (Doc. 167) 14 VASQUEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Larry William Cortinas is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s excessive force 19 claims against Defendants Vasquez, Fisher and Washington, and deliberate indifference to serious 20 medical needs claim against Defendant Ramos. 21 I. INTRODUCTION 22 On October 2, 2023, following the issuance of District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston’s Order 23 Adopting Findings and Recommendations Following Evidentiary Hearing, the Court issued its 24 Order Setting Remaining Discovery Deadlines. (Doc. 164.) The deadline for the completion of 25 discovery was set for March 1, 2024, and the deadline for the filing of dispositive motions was set 26 for May 1, 2024. (Id.) 27 On February 21, 2024, Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.