Pascua

(PC) Outhoummountry v. Pascua

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20241:22-cv-00104California4,333 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 STACEN OMAR No. 1:22-cv-00104-SAB (PC)

OUTHOUMMOUNTRY,

11 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT Plaintiff, TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT 12 JUDGE TO THIS ACTION v. 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION PASCUA, et al., REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ 14 EXHAUSTION MOTION FOR SUMMARY Defendants. JUDGMENT 15 (ECF No. 48) 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ exhaustion motion for summary judgment, filed 20 August 28, 2023. 21 I. 22 BACKGROUND 23 This action is proceeding against Defendants N. Pascua and M. Childress for deliberate 24 indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 25 Defendants filed an answer to the third amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.