Warden
(PC) Sanchez v. Warden
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ, No. 1:23-cv-01706-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
13 v. TO THIS ACITON 14 WARDEN AT CCI, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE
15 Defendants. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF
16 (ECF No. 11) 17
18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 19
U.S.C. § 1983.
20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed February 29, 2024. 21 I. 22
SCREENING REQUIREMENT
23 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 24 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 25 Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 26 “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that…