Thorntona

(PC) Valenzuela v. Thorntona

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20242:23-cv-02494California300 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIO P. VALENZUELA, No. 2:23-cv-02494-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 THORNTONA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By an order filed January 22, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to file a signed complaint and 18 was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be 19 dismissed. ECF No. 8. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the 20 court’s order and has not filed a signed complaint. 21 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 22 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice and all 24 pending motions (ECF Nos. 2, 7) terminated. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.