(SS) Chavez Mendoza v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20241:23-cv-00350California5,474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EDUARDO CHAVEZ MENDOZA, Case No. 1:23-cv-00350-EPG Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

v. SECURITY COMPLAINT

13 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF Nos. 1, 13).

SECURITY,

14 Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding his application for supplemental security income benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 9). Plaintiff argues as follows: 1. The ALJ’s RFC determination is unsupported by substantial evidence as he 23 failed to properly evaluate the medical opinions of record in accordance with the prevailing rules and regulations. 2. The ALJ’s Step 5 determination is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.