(SS) Servin v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAQUEL LEMUS SERVIN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01178-EPG 12 Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL
13 v. SECURITY COMPLAINT 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF Nos. 1, 19). 15 SECURITY, 16 Defendant. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an 19 unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding her 20 application for disability insurance benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment 21 by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any 22 appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 13). 23 Plaintiff generally argues that “the ALJ’s physical RFC is not supported by substantial 24 evidence of record.” (ECF No. 19 at 2). 25 Having reviewed the record, administrative transcript, parties’ briefs, and the applicable 26 law, the Court finds as follows. 27 // 28 // 1 I. …