Blanco

(PC) McCurdy v. Blanco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20242:21-cv-01764California5,817 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES C. McCURDY, No. 2:21-CV-1764-DAD-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. and 14 P. BLANCO, et al., AMENDED FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to partially dismiss. See ECF 19 No. 26. On March 19, 2024, the Court issued findings and recommendations that Defendants’ 20 motion, which at the time the findings and recommendations were processed, was unopposed. 21 See ECF No. 45. Plaintiff has now filed an opposition. See ECF No. 44. The Court therefore 22 issues this order and amended findings and recommendations to correctly reflect that Defendants’ 23 motion is in fact opposed. 24 In considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept all allegations of 25 material fact in the complaint as true. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93-94 (2007). The 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.