Baeza

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN EDWARD MITCHELL, Case No. 1:20-cv-00857-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFENDANT VANG SHOULD NOT BE

13 v. DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT

14 H. BAEZA, et al. INFORMATION TO EFFECTUATE

SERVICE

15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 42) 16

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

17 18 Plaintiff John Edward Mitchell is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amendment 20 retaliation claims against Defendants Baeza and Gutierrez; Eighth Amendment Failure to Protect 21 claims against Defendants Baeza, Gutierrez, Valencia-Mendoza, John Doe #1, Parra, and Vang; 22 Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress claims against Defendants Baeza and Gutierrez; 23 Negligence claims against Defendants Baeza, Gutierrez, Valencia-Mendoza, Parra, John Doe #1 24 and Vang; Bane Act claims against Defendants Baeza, Gutierrez, Valencia-Mendoza,…