Baeza

(PC) John E. Mitchell v. Baeza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20241:20-cv-00857California789 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN EDWARD MITCHELL, Case No. 1:20-cv-00857-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFENDANT VANG SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT

H. BAEZA, et al. INFORMATION TO EFFECTUATE

SERVICE

Defendants. (Doc. No. 42)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff John Edward Mitchell is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendants Baeza and Gutierrez; Eighth Amendment Failure to Protect claims against Defendants Baeza, Gutierrez, Valencia-Mendoza, John Doe #1, Parra, and Vang; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress claims against Defendants Baeza and Gutierrez; Negligence claims against Defendants Baeza, Gutierrez, Valencia-Mendoza, Parra, John Doe #1 and Vang; Bane Act claims against Defendants Baeza, Gutierrez, Valencia-Mendoza,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.