Rios

(PC) Hill v. Rios

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20242:18-cv-03089California4,288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:18-cv-03089 MCE AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 46. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, ECF No. 47, and defendants have filed a reply. ECF No. 48. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends that the motion for summary judgment be granted. I. Procedural History This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s first amended complaint against defendants Rios and White for violations of plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment right to be free from excessive force. ECF No. 27 (screening order). II. Plaintiff’s Allegations At all times relevant to the allegations in this case, plaintiff was a civil detainee at California State Prison-Sacramento…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.