Obama

(PC) Van Huisen v. Obama

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20242:23-cv-02448California2,569 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN, No. 2:23-cv-2448 DJC DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 BARACK OBAMA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. Presently before the court are plaintiff’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 19 2, 7, 10) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below the court 20 will grant plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and that the complaint be dismissed 21 with leave to amend. 22 IN FORMA PAUPERIS 23 Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 24 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 25 Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 26 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial partial filing fee in 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.