(PS) Brewer v. California State Bar

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20242:23-cv-00860California388 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 TERRENCE BREWER, Case No. 2:23-cv-00860-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA STATE BAR, et al., Defendants. 14 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action against Defendants. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 7, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 25.) Plaintiff filed objections on March 19, 2024, and defendants filed objections on March 20, 2024. (ECF Nos. 27, 28.) Those filings were considered by the undersigned. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.