(PS) Brewer v. California State Bar

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TERRENCE BREWER, Case No. 2:23-cv-00860-TLN-JDP 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 CALIFORNIA STATE BAR, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action against Defendants. This matter was 16 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 17 302. On March 7, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 18 were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 25.) Plaintiff filed objections 20 on March 19, 2024, and defendants filed objections on March 20, 2024. (ECF Nos. 27, 28.) 21 Those filings were considered by the undersigned. 22 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 23 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 24 See Britt v. Simi…