Akhavan

(PC) Gonzalez v. Akhavan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20241:23-cv-01506California587 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAIME CESAR GONZALEZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-01506-BAM (PC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER CONSTRUING PLAINTIFF’S

RESPONSE TO SCREENING ORDER AS

9 v. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 9) 10 AKHAVAN, et al.,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

11 Defendants. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

AMENDED COMPLAINT

12 (ECF No. 9) 13 THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 14 15 Plaintiff Jaime Cesar Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 16 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 4, 2024, the 17 Court screened the complaint and granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint or a notice 18 of voluntary dismissal within thirty days. (ECF No. 8.) 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s response to the screening order, filed March 25, 20 2024. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff states that the screening order he received names a Defendant M. 21 Pallares, who he did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.