(PC)Montgomery

(PC)Montgomery v. CDCR Corrections Officer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20241:23-cv-00439California1,180 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAULINE MONTGOMERY, Case No. 1:23-cv-00439-KES-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

13 v. FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDERS

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

14 CDCR CORRECTIONS OFFICER, et al., (ECF No. 1) 15 Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 17 I. Background 18 Plaintiff Pauline Montgomery (“Plaintiff”) is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se in this 19 civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On March 24, 2023, the Court issued an order striking the complaint for lack of signature 21 and directing Plaintiff to submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the 22 $402.00 filing fee to proceed with this action and to file a signed complaint, not to exceed 25 23 pages in length, or a notice of voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 3.) The Court expressly warned 24 Plaintiff that failure to comply with the Court’s order would result in dismissal of this action. (Id. 25 at 2.) 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.