Romero
(PC) Williams v. Romero
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LANCE WILLIAMS, No. 2:17-cv-1884 TLN DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ROMERO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 18 U.S.C. §1983. On September 8, 2023, this court ordered the parties to file pretrial statements. 19 Plaintiff’s statement was due February 23, 2024. (ECF No. 195.) He has not filed one. 20 Defendants timely filed their statement on March 8, 2024. (ECF No. 196.) 21 Pretrial statements under Local Rule 281 are a necessary step in preparing this case for 22 trial. In the September 8 order, this court advised the parties that “failure to file a pretrial 23 statement may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of this action.” (ECF No. 24 195 at 5.) Plaintiff has had more than ample time to prepare and file a pretrial statement. He has 25 failed to file the statement or seek an extension of time to do so. Based…