Gastelum

Gastelum v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20241:21-cv-01740California1,985 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FERNANDO GASTELUM, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-1740 JLT BAM ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS, STRIKING v. ) CERTAIN ALLEGATIONS AND CLAIMS, ) DISMISSING THE REMAINING CAUSE OF KOHL’S INC., ) ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER LEAVE TO ) AMEND, AND TERMINATING THE PARTIES’ Defendant. ) CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT AS MOOT ) ) (Docs. 38, 40, 45) ) ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT ) TO CLOSE THIS CASE )

Fernando Gastelum seeks to hold Kohl’s Inc. liable for failure to have accessible features in stores its located in Bakersfield and El Centro, California. In the second amended complaint, Plaintiff added allegations related to additional visits made in 2022 to the identified Kohl’s stores. (See Doc. 37 at 8-9, ¶¶ 26, 28; id. at 10-13, ¶¶ 35-41; id. at 15-16, ¶¶ 50-56.) In addition,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.