Gastelum
Gastelum v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3
4
5
6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 FERNANDO GASTELUM, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-1740 JLT BAM ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS, STRIKING 13 v. ) CERTAIN ALLEGATIONS AND CLAIMS, ) DISMISSING THE REMAINING CAUSE OF 14 KOHL’S INC., ) ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER LEAVE TO ) AMEND, AND TERMINATING THE PARTIES’ 15 Defendant. ) CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT AS MOOT 16 ) ) (Docs. 38, 40, 45) 17 ) ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT 18 ) TO CLOSE THIS CASE ) 19
20 Fernando Gastelum seeks to hold Kohl’s Inc. liable for failure to have accessible features in 21 stores its located in Bakersfield and El Centro, California. In the second amended complaint, Plaintiff 22 added allegations related to additional visits made in 2022 to the identified Kohl’s stores. (See Doc. 37 23 at 8-9, ¶¶ 26, 28; id. at 10-13, ¶¶ 35-41; id. at 15-16, ¶¶ 50-56.) In addition,…