Rudas

(PC) Serrano v. Rudas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20241:22-cv-00950California408 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRES MASQUEDA SERRANO, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00950-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

ROBERT RUDAS, et al., (Doc. 17) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Andres Masqueda Serrano is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 15, 2024, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending this action proceed only on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Rudas, that Defendant De La Sierra be dismissed from the action, and that any remaining claims in Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed. (Doc. 17.) The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.