Rudas
(PC) Serrano v. Rudas
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRES MASQUEDA SERRANO, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00950-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS
v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
ROBERT RUDAS, et al., (Doc. 17) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Andres Masqueda Serrano is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 15, 2024, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending this action proceed only on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Rudas, that Defendant De La Sierra be dismissed from the action, and that any remaining claims in Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed. (Doc. 17.) The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that…