Rudas

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDRES MASQUEDA SERRANO, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00950-KES-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

13 v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

14 ROBERT RUDAS, et al., (Doc. 17) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Andres Masqueda Serrano is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States 19 magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 15, 2024, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and 21 recommendations, recommending this action proceed only on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 22 deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Rudas, that Defendant 23 De La Sierra be dismissed from the action, and that any remaining claims in Plaintiff’s complaint 24 be dismissed. (Doc. 17.) The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and 25 contained notice that…