(PS) Spikes v. NewRez LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AYANNA UMEKA SPIKES, No. 2:24-cv-0046 DAD DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
14 NEWREZ LLC, F/K/A NEW
PENNFINANCIAL, LLC D/B/A
15 SHELLPOINT, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Ayanna Umeka Spikes is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was 19 referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 On January 12, 2024, defendants McCarthy & Holthus, LPP, and Melissa Robbins Coutts filed a 21 motion to dismiss, which is noticed for hearing before the undersigned on March 29, 2024, 22 pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). (ECF Nos. 4 & 5.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) plaintiff 23 was to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion not less “than 24 fourteen (14) days after the motion was filed.” Plaintiff, however, failed to file a timely 25 opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. 26 Accordingly, on February 15, 2024, the…