Medina

(PC) Cotton v. Medina

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20241:22-cv-00568California5,223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 WESLEY COTTON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00568-JLT-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY DEFENDANT MEDINA’S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING EXHAUSTION OF MEDINA, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 14 Defendants. AND

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO VIEW VIDEO

(ECF Nos. 38, 49)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY,

DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS

20 Plaintiff Wesley Cotton is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP) in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Medina moved for summary judgement, arguing that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as to his failure to protect claim against her. (ECF No. 38). Plaintiff opposed the motion, arguing that Defendant Medina admitted in her answer that he exhausted his administrative remedies and that he did, in fact,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.