Medina

(PC) Cotton v. Medina

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20241:22-cv-00568California5,223 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 WESLEY COTTON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00568-JLT-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 TO DENY DEFENDANT MEDINA’S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 REGARDING EXHAUSTION OF MEDINA, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 14 Defendants. AND 15

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

16 MOTION TO VIEW VIDEO

17 (ECF Nos. 38, 49)

18

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY,

19 DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS

20 21 Plaintiff Wesley Cotton is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP) in this civil 22 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Medina moved for summary 23 judgement, arguing that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as to his failure 24 to protect claim against her. (ECF No. 38). Plaintiff opposed the motion, arguing that 25 Defendant Medina admitted in her answer that he exhausted his administrative remedies and 26 that he did, in fact,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.