Medina
(PC) Cotton v. Medina
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10 WESLEY COTTON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00568-JLT-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 TO DENY DEFENDANT MEDINA’S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 REGARDING EXHAUSTION OF MEDINA, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 14 Defendants. AND 15
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
16 MOTION TO VIEW VIDEO
17 (ECF Nos. 38, 49)
18
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY,
19 DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS
20 21 Plaintiff Wesley Cotton is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP) in this civil 22 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Medina moved for summary 23 judgement, arguing that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as to his failure 24 to protect claim against her. (ECF No. 38). Plaintiff opposed the motion, arguing that 25 Defendant Medina admitted in her answer that he exhausted his administrative remedies and 26 that he did, in fact,…