Lemus

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IGNACIO LEMUS, Case No. 1:24-cv-00050-JLT-HBK

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

13 v. PROSECUTE AND OBEY COURT ORDERS

14 VISALIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and 14-DAY DEADLINE

DOES #1-3,

15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review. As more fully set forth below, 18 the undersigned recommends this case be dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to 19 prosecute this action and timely comply with this Court’s order. 20 I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND 21 Plaintiff Lemus, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis filed a civil complaint under 42 22 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). The Complaint asserts that Plaintiff was falsely arrested on an 23 unspecified date on charges of drug possession and driving without a license by officers of the Visalia 24 Police Department. (Id. at 5). The Complaint states that Plaintiff was not read his Miranda rights and 25 the arrest was used to…