(HC) Garcia v. Warden, FCI Mendota

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20241:23-cv-00833California1,017 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 JOSE A. GARCIA, Case No. 1:23-cv-00833-SAB-HC

12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF

13 v. HABEAS CORPUS AS MOOT,

TERMINATE RESPONDENT’S MOTION

14 WARDEN, FCI MENDOTA, TO DISMISS, AND DENY RESPONDENT’S

SUPERSEDING MOTION TO DISMISS AS

15 Respondent. MOOT

16 (ECF Nos. 11, 13)

17 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT

18 JUDGE

19 20 Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 21 U.S.C. § 2241. 22 I. 23 BACKGROUND 24 In the petition, Petitioner challenges the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ policy 5410.01, “last 25 amended 3/10/2023.” (ECF No. 1 at 2. 1) Petitioner alleges that the policy excludes inmates with 26 immigration detainers, like Petitioner, from applying First Step Act (“FSA”) Earned Time 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.