Portillo

(PC) Davis v. Portillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20241:22-cv-00457California2,436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER BRANDON DAVIS, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00457-KES-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR AN INVESTIGATOR

v. (Doc. 41) M. PORTILLO, et al.,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Defendants. FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

(Doc. 42)

Plaintiff Christopher Brandon Davis is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On February 28, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Motion for the Request for an Investigator.” (Doc. 41.) That same date, Plaintiff filed his third motion for the appointment of counsel. (Doc. 42.) II. DISCUSSION Request for an Investigator Plaintiff states he makes his request for an investigator “on the off chance this Court refuses [his] request for counsel.” (Doc. 41.) He maintains this action “is geographically very (Id.) Plaintiff contends that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.