(PC) Stone v. CDC Officers

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20241:24-cv-00253California1,817 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NICHOLAS SCOTT STONE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00253-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

13 v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

14 CDC OFFICERS, et al., DISMISS ACTION AS DUPLICATIVE (ECF No. 1) 15 Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 17 Plaintiff Nicholas Scott Stone (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was initiated 19 on February 26, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) 20 I. Screening Requirement and Standard 21 The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding pro se and in forma 22 pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to 23 dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be 24 granted, or if it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 25 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 26 II. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.