Barocio

Barocio v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20241:20-cv-01182California2,872 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YESENIA BAROCIO, No. 1:20-cv-01182 JLT SKO 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

13 v. (Doc. 14) 14 COUNTY OF FRESNO, and DOES 1-10, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Yesenia Barocio asserts that she was terminated because she took leave under the 18 California Family Rights Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act. (See Doc. 1.) She seeks to 19 hold the County of Fresno liable for discrimination and retaliation under the CFRA and 20 interference and discrimination under the FMLA. Id. at 5-13.) The County of Fresno seeks 21 summary judgment. (See Doc. 14.) Barocio opposes the motion as to her first, third, and fourth 22 causes of action (see Doc. 16), but “does not oppose Defendant’s motion for partial summary 23 judgment of the Second and Fifth Causes of Action.” (Doc. 16 at 9.) For the reasons explained 24 below, the motion is GRANTED. 25 I. Factual Background 26 Barocio was first employed by the County’s Department of Social Services in 2012. 27 (Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.