Praveen

(PC) Lopez v. Praveen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20242:21-cv-02380California1,657 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SALVADOR LOPEZ, No. 2:21-cv-02380-DJC-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SINGH PRAVEEN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 1, 2023, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgement. (Mot. 21 Summ. J. (“MSJ”) (ECF No. 32)), which Plaintiff opposed (Opp’n (ECF No. 41)). On 22 December 19, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 23 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 24 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen 25 days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 26 49.) 27 The Court has reviewed the file and declines to adopt the findings and 28 recommendations. 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.