(SS) Goltz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20241:23-cv-00183California11,689 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 REBECCA ANNE GOLTZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-00183-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;

13 v. DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY AND AGAINST

15 Defendant. PLAINTIFF REBECCA ANNE GOLTZ

AND TO CLOSE THIS ACTION

16 (ECF Nos. 16, 18, 19) 17 18 I. 19 INTRODUCTION 20 Rebecca Anne Goltz (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 21 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for 22 disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on 23 the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. 24 Boone.1 25 Plaintiff requests the decision of Commissioner be vacated and the case be remanded for 26 further proceedings, arguing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.