(PS) Larson v. Commonspirit Health
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NANCEE LARSON, Case No. 2:23-cv-00747-TLN-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action against Defendants. This matter was 18 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 19 302. On February 23, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 21 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 5.) The time to file objections 22 has passed, and no objections were filed. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 26 magistrate judge are…