Sanders

Sanders v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20241:22-cv-00577California943 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILIP SANDERS, No. 1:22-cv-0577 JLT HBK Plaintiff, Appeal No. 24-1413 v. ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS

STATUS ON APPEAL

ROBERT HICKS and J. LARA, (Doc. 25) Defendants. 16 Philip Sanders proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court dismissed the action for failure to state a cognizable claim and entered judgment. (Docs. 14, 18.) On March 8, 2024, Plaintiff filed Notice of Appeal, which was processed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit as Case No. 24-1413. (Docs. 21, 22). The Ninth Circuit referred this matter to the Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of in forma pauperis status is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.