(PC) Knight v. St. Andre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20242:23-cv-00177California4,325 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLARENCE V. KNIGHT, No. 2:23-cv-00177-DAD-DB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 R. ST. ANDRE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The court granted plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and 19 dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend on November 2, 2023. (ECF Nos. 6, 8.) 20 Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 8.) 21 Plaintiff timely filed a First Amended Complaint on November 30, 2023. (ECF No. 10.) 22 He filed an additional, and substantively similar document titled “First Amended Complaint” on 23 December 18, 2023. (ECF No. 11.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned dismisses 24 plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (FAC) and grants plaintiff an additional opportunity to 25 amend. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 SCREENING 2 I. Legal Standards 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.