Boyden

(HC) Martinez Santoyo v. Boyden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20242:23-cv-00447California4,957 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE TRINIDAD MARTINEZ No. 2:23-cv-00447 DJC JDP

SANTOYO,

12 Petitioner, ORDER v. 14 LASHA BOYDEN, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 Petitioner is represented by counsel and has filed this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 9, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on both parties and which contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 16.) Petitioner has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 17) and Respondents have filed a response (ECF No. 18). In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.