Boyden

(HC) Martinez Santoyo v. Boyden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20242:23-cv-00447California4,957 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE TRINIDAD MARTINEZ No. 2:23-cv-00447 DJC JDP

SANTOYO,

12 Petitioner, 13 ORDER v. 14 LASHA BOYDEN, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner is represented by counsel and has filed this Petition for Writ of 18 Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 9, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and 21 Recommendations herein which were served on both parties and which contained 22 notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed 23 within fourteen days. (ECF No. 16.) Petitioner has filed objections to the Findings and 24 Recommendations (ECF No. 17) and Respondents have filed a response (ECF No. 18). 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 26 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review. Having carefully reviewed the entire 27 file, the Court finds the Findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.