Norris

(PC) Jordan v. Norris

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20241:20-cv-00467California829 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 LAMAR JORDAN, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-0467 JLT EPG (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ) RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S ORDER 13 v. ) DENYING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ) 14 O. NORRIS, et al., ) (Doc. 105) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 )

17 Lamar Jordan is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action, in which he seeks 18 to hold Drs. Napoles and Anunciacion liable for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s serious medical 19 needs. The matter is set for trial on May 21, 2014. (Doc. 111.) Plaintiff moved for appointment of 20 counsel in this action, and the magistrate judge denied the motion on February 1, 2024. (Doc. 103.). 21 Plaintiff now seeks reconsideration of the order denying appointment of counsel. (Doc. 105.) 22 Defendants oppose the motion. (Doc. 110.) 23 Pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[o]n motion and just terms, the 24 court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.