Solares
Solares v. Burns
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DORA SOLARES, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-01349 JLT BAM ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN ) PART DEFENDANT BURNES’ MOTION TO 13 v. ) DISMISS 14 JOSEPH BURNS1, et al., ) ) (Doc. 22) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 17 Dora Solares alleges that after her son, Luis Romero, was brutally murdered by his cellmate at 18 Corcoran State Prison, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Sergeant Joseph 19 Burnes and other officers2 took and shared photographs of Mr. Romero’s mutilated remains, which 20
21 1 Plaintiff asserts that she has conducted an investigation and has determined that Mr. Burnes’ name does not 22 have an “e” in it. However, she now spells his name with an “e.” Because the opposition to the motion spells the name with an “e,” the Court presumes that the plaintiff’s footnote 1 contains a typo, and the Court adopts 23 the spelling of the name with an “e.” (See Doc. 21 at 3 n.1; Doc. 22.)
24 2 Plaintiff initially named…