(PC)Pryer

(PC)Pryer v. Bott

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20241:23-cv-00167California1,649 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DESMOND PRYER, Case No. 1:23-cv-00167-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO MODIFY

v. SCHEDULING ORDER AND FOR LEAVE

TO FILE EXHAUSTION MOTION

BOTT, (ECF No. 43) Defendant. Exhaustion Motion Deadline: April 11, 2024 16 I. Background Plaintiff Desmond Pryer (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Bott (“Defendant”) for deliberate indifference to conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 11, 17.) Pursuant to the Court’s June 2, 2023 discovery and scheduling order, the deadline for filing motions for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for failure to exhaust administrative remedies was October 2, 2023. (ECF No. 26.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.