Parrish

Parrish v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20241:23-cv-00284California693 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARNELL PARRISH, Case No. 1:23-cv-00284-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE

v. EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND

RELATED DATES

WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. (Doc. 20) Defendant.

16 17 Background Plaintiff Carnell Parrish (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action against Defendant Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (“Defendant”) with the filing of a complaint in state court on or about January 13, 2023. (Doc. 1 at 2). On February 24, 2023, Defendant removed the action to this Court. Id. On May 24, 2023, the Court entered the operative scheduling order which, among other things, admonished the parties that the case management dates set therein are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a showing of good cause, even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. (Doc. 13 at 7). On September 27, 2023, the parties filed a joint mid-discovery status report in which they summarized their ongoing discovery…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.