Parrish
Parrish v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 CARNELL PARRISH, Case No. 1:23-cv-00284-JLT-CDB
12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED
STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE
13 v. EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND
RELATED DATES
14 WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. (Doc. 20) 15 Defendant.
16 17 18 Background 19 Plaintiff Carnell Parrish (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action against Defendant Wal-Mart 20 Associates, Inc. (“Defendant”) with the filing of a complaint in state court on or about January 21 13, 2023. (Doc. 1 at 2). On February 24, 2023, Defendant removed the action to this Court. Id. 22 On May 24, 2023, the Court entered the operative scheduling order which, among other things, 23 admonished the parties that the case management dates set therein are considered to be firm and 24 will not be modified absent a showing of good cause, even if the request to modify is made by 25 stipulation. (Doc. 13 at 7). 26 On September 27, 2023, the parties filed a joint mid-discovery status report in which they 27 summarized their ongoing discovery…