Trujillo

Trujillo v. H&S LBSE Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20241:21-cv-00058California6,166 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 JOSE TRUJILLO, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-0058 JLT BAM ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 v. ) ) (Doc. 24) 14 H&S LBSE INC. dba 7-ELEVEN #22736G, ) et al., ) ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL 15 ) JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S Defendants. ) STATE LAW CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 16 )

17 Jose Trujillo asserts he is disabled as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act. He 18 contends H&S LBSE Inc., doing business as 7-Eleven #22736G, and 7-Eleven, Inc., violated federal 19 and California disability access laws by not having accessible features at a store located in Los Banos, 20 California. (See generally Doc. 14.) Plaintiff seeks summary judgment on his claims pursuant to Rule 21 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, asserting he is entitled to injunctive relief under the ADA 22 and statutory damages under the Unruh Act. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.